This week’s things to know:

In Order to Achieve Tree Equity, the U.S. Must Plant 522 Million Trees in Urban Areas–via The Urbanist

This fascinating article by Natalie Brickell explores a new Report by American Forests which quantifies exactly how many trees we need to plant to create equity in tree canopy in US cities. I think most of us who explore large urban areas regularly have probably already seen how marginalized areas often are completely devoid of healthy tree cover but this article puts into stark perspective exactly how bad the situation is. There is a lot to unpack and discuss here, but the above graphic feels most telling to me. The disparity in green canopy between communities with a high percentage of people of color and those without and similarly comparing places with high and low poverty is just massive. The heatwaves that we have seen over the past weeks and are likely to see in the future will only exacerbate these issues

Where sidewalks and bike paths have priority–via CNU.org

In a quick article over at Public Square, Roy Symons takes a look at new plans and a showcase project in Nanaimo, BC where his engineering firm has worked with the city to create a Dutch-style sidewalk and pike path system along a major road.

National 'Vision Zero' Resolution Introduced–via StreetsblogUSA

The growing discussion over Vision Zero is one step closer to getting its day in Congress. Streetsblog has reported that a resolution has been introduced by a group of five senators and five representatives to allow states to use existing federal funding to build out their own Vision Zero Plans. Traffic fatalities are described as a public health crisis in the resolution – something I think many of us agree with. Should this ultimately be passed the next logical discussion is about what states will actually be putting into the plans they write. This got me thinking about an article Chuck Mahron over at Strong Towns put out titled One Billion Bollards this week which explains how often we design and build cities in a way that is designed to sacrifice pedestrians in order to protect the occupants of vehicles. His article reminded me of the Trolley Problem, except the trolley is a three-thousand pound SUV and engineers seem, most often, to choose to squish the pedestrians, to protect the occupant of the vehicle containing the product of decades worth of safety standards built in. Hopefully some forward-thinking engineering discussion goes into those Vision Zero Plans.

Here's the standard disclaimer: We always encourage our team members to freely share their thoughts and opinions, both in these newsletters and elsewhere. Given that, opinions expressed by any one member do not necessarily represent the views of the company as a whole.

Do you enjoy these weekly roundups? (Why wouldn’t you?) You can get them sent straight to your email inbox every Friday, if you’re into that.

Want to learn more about how fiscal analysis can help you make your city stronger financially?

We created a new sister website showcasing how we use math, maps, and money to help cities communicate your resource gap and explore ways to increase tax revenue and improve service efficiency without necessarily raising taxes.

Have a look! →

Hey, friends in local government:

Hey, friends who love cities! If you're looking for a place to discuss these topics (and more) with like-minded peers who want to help create a more resilient community, check out our Community Cultivators Network. It's free to join, and we are currently working to build new features for our 2021 relaunch, so stay tuned! We'll arm you with the content, ideas, and support to take small impactful steps to cultivate change.